<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Conservativist - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-02152eab" type="application/json"/><link>http://theconservativist.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://theconservativist.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:02:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Greenville HQ Opening Saturday for Gingrich</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2011/11/10/greenville-hq-opening-saturday-for-gingrich/#comment-385623327</link><description>I am assuming Gary Coats will endorse anyone but Gingrich due to the fact that Newt and Christina Jeffrey are friends.  Anyone who hired Jeffrey for anything has gotta be nuts right?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bachman for President</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:02:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kelly Payne Relationship Revealed &amp;#8211; What Does It Matter?</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2010/02/17/kelly-payne-relationship-revealed-what-does-it-matter/#comment-377052551</link><description>The person who leaked the email is a criminal.&lt;br&gt;The people that show the leaked emails are criminals.&lt;br&gt;Put their faces up here and expose them as criminals!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Doug</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:26:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ron Paul to Visit Spartanburg</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2011/11/09/ron-paul-to-visit-spartanburg/#comment-359514823</link><description>Hell Yeah</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Frank</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 16:19:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama on Economy in 2009</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2011/09/27/obama-on-economy-in-2009/#comment-321837919</link><description>Maybe term limiting was a little strong. I agree with your opinion. I'm just curious what the "one term proposition" would be?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Conservativist</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:35:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama on Economy in 2009</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2011/09/27/obama-on-economy-in-2009/#comment-321694320</link><description>I'm not sure that he was term limiting himself like you mentioned in your tweet. I think he was more just clear on the idea that if things didn't turn around over his first term then it's unlikely for him to achieve a second term. Looking at polls and the numbers as they're going right now, it looks like he had pretty reasonable insight there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">commondream</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:00:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Palmetto Freedom Forum</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2011/08/24/palmetto-freedom-forum/#comment-301548750</link><description>Excellent to know the voters will get a chance to hear the candidates speak at length (for better or worse) and not have to endure the annoyances of the modern "debate" format.  Thank you, APP!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GregoryJC</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 00:18:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Palmetto Freedom Forum</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2011/08/24/palmetto-freedom-forum/#comment-297250651</link><description>Ron Paul 2012!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">knarfxii</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 14:30:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Strange Spartanburg GOP Alliance</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2011/04/08/strange-spartanburg-gop-alliance/#comment-268649435</link><description>Gary I missed reading and commenting on this, several months ago. If you see Rick and I talking, stand back and observe -who- is playing -who-. Our political relationship is similar to that of a snake and a mongoose. . . :)  Rick throwing me under the bus? Of course he would. Remember, 'gamers' always like to 'game' gamers. . .and this is amateur hour kind of games, compared with what is going on nationally and internationally. Give me a hand with Let's Talk - Spartanburg - I still am trying to persuade a very reluctant Trey to speak on a regular basis there, however, with or without Trey we usually have interesting speakers from all sides of the spectrum, civic and political, and from both sides of the Tea Party there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pauljansen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:08:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Term Limits for President?</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2009/05/21/no-term-limits-for-president/#comment-240966806</link><description>Federal judges and other bureaucrats are appointed, often for life, and there is nothing, after the fact, that we as voters, can do about it, but I hear nobody calling for "term limits" for those persons.  Why is it that we would limit terms for those offices that we, as voters, have the power to limit with our vote?  Is it just me....or is something wrong with this picture?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Curtis</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 03:37:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prohibition Gains Ground in SC</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2011/04/14/sc-house-judiciary-subcommittee-votes-on-prohibition/#comment-190019338</link><description>I for one, am so sick of these people attempting to say I have no family values and they need to 'help me'.  I am a conservative and this is not what I feel we should be focusing on.  Leave me and my family alone !!!  Common Sense please.  You are exactly right, how is this stopping someone from going across the state line or stocking up on Christmas Ev?  Further more, the small business owners would be told they cannot conduct business and make money in the failing economy, which government is continuing to ignore.  How about conducting business on other religious holidays other than Christians.  And domestic violence???  You need to look at your laws on putting these people away because not having being able to purchase 'alcohol' on religious holidays will not stop the violence 363 remaining days .  GEEZ!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PawleyGirl</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:17:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SC Congressional Redistricting Hearing</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2011/04/11/sc-congressional-redistricting-hearing/#comment-184489907</link><description>Thanks for clarifying!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Conservativist</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:49:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SC Congressional Redistricting Hearing</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2011/04/11/sc-congressional-redistricting-hearing/#comment-183926188</link><description>Gary, the public hearing tonight is the ONLY hearing in the Upstate....conducted by the HOUSE subcommittee.  The public hearing two weeks ago was the ONLY hearing conducted by the SENATE subcommittee.  The House and the Senate subcommittees work separately.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Herren</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:35:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: South Carolina &amp;#8211; Not in Ron Paul&amp;#8217;s Plans?</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2011/03/30/south-carolina-not-in-ron-pauls-plans/#comment-181259708</link><description>Check this out &lt;a href="https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=648892819#!/notes/south-carolina-republican-party/first-gop-debate-expected-to-draw-wide-range-of-candidates/10150146605962555" rel="nofollow"&gt;https://www.facebook.com/profi...&lt;/a&gt; -  GREENVILLE SC TEA PARTY RALLY BEFORE THE FIRST PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.facebook.com/?sk=lf#!/event.php?eid=198157323557412" rel="nofollow"&gt;https://www.facebook.com/?sk=l...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 21:36:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: South Carolina &amp;#8211; Not in Ron Paul&amp;#8217;s Plans?</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2011/03/30/south-carolina-not-in-ron-pauls-plans/#comment-175964105</link><description>Sorry with the delay on those comments getting approved. I installed a new commenting system and still working out some of the kinks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Conservativist</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:51:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: South Carolina &amp;#8211; Not in Ron Paul&amp;#8217;s Plans?</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2011/03/30/south-carolina-not-in-ron-pauls-plans/#comment-175827124</link><description>My sign went in my window already... you know with a unconstitutional war with Lybia and all.  It is very appropriate.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gadson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:48:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: South Carolina &amp;#8211; Not in Ron Paul&amp;#8217;s Plans?</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2011/03/30/south-carolina-not-in-ron-pauls-plans/#comment-175821466</link><description>After the way he was disregarded and mistreated by some of "us" last time around, justice should have us beg like little vagrants on bended knee for his appearance.  However, being the gentle man that he is, the Good Doctor Paul would never ask us to grovel, he is probably waiting on a sincere (emphasis on sincere) invitation from us.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bruce Littlejohn Boulevard</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:34:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: South Carolina &amp;#8211; Not in Ron Paul&amp;#8217;s Plans?</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2011/03/30/south-carolina-not-in-ron-pauls-plans/#comment-175799104</link><description>I live in the upstate of SC and I would love for Ron to come here. I see numerous Paul bumper stickers and I think that he will find that he will be recieved more broadly this time around. COME TO SC DR PAUL!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris in Greenville</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:44:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: South Carolina &amp;#8211; Not in Ron Paul&amp;#8217;s Plans?</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2011/03/30/south-carolina-not-in-ron-pauls-plans/#comment-175786895</link><description>RON PAUL 2012! DESTINY AWAITS!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher S. Lawton</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:16:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: South Carolina &amp;#8211; Not in Ron Paul&amp;#8217;s Plans?</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2011/03/30/south-carolina-not-in-ron-pauls-plans/#comment-175210544</link><description>Run Ron Run, and then Win Ron Win!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Frank</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:16:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SC House District 37 Prediction</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2010/10/27/sc-house-district-37/#comment-174975516</link><description>Rick,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Glad to see your back and commenting, anonymously as usual!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gary Coats</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:43:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SC House District 37 Prediction</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2010/10/27/sc-house-district-37/#comment-174975515</link><description>Read comment #1.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Emotional folks usually do not see a clear reality.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">spartanburgforreal</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 20:45:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SC House District 37 Prediction</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2010/10/27/sc-house-district-37/#comment-174975514</link><description>Wow.  I really got this one wrong.  Goes to show when your not out in the field for 4 months you miss out on a lot.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Congrats to Mr. Parker.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gary Coats</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 09:41:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SC House District 37 Prediction</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2010/10/27/sc-house-district-37/#comment-174975513</link><description>Got a postcard from the NRA today supporting Steve Parker and citing why they support him and that he has an 'A' rating and that his opponent (unnamed) has an 'F' rating.  While I'm sure that they refer Delores Frazier, Parker's main opponent in this race is Davenport.  I'm pretty sure Ralph Davenport doesn't have an 'F' NRA rating.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm still not sure which of the two I'll vote for, but this ticked me off enough that I'm more inclined to vote for Davenport at the point.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm pretty sure Davenport has an 'A' but I'm having trouble finding out for certain.  Can anyone help?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:34:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SC House District 37 Prediction</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2010/10/27/sc-house-district-37/#comment-174975512</link><description>It will probably come down to the democrats I think.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On one hand you have the conservatives who really don't know who the candidates are and will vote for the guy with the R next to his name regardless.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then you have the tea-party folks who will vote for whoever can position themself as the most conservative... in this case that's Davenport.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then you have the much smaller group of Democrats/Liberals/non-conservative independents.  Together those groups don't have enough clout to put Frazer in.  If they do cross to the other two... the lesser evil for those folks would be Parker I think.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think Parker gets enough of those votes that he wins... because he's not quite as conservative (though I bet he hates hearing anyone say that).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kurt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:29:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SC House District 37 Prediction</title><link>http://theconservativist.com/2010/10/27/sc-house-district-37/#comment-174975511</link><description>Your personal anger is showing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">spartanburgforreal</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:54:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
